DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TJR
Docket No: 11072-14
5 February 2015
This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request dated
21 September 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were
advised in our letter that your application had been denied.
Your current request has. been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 4 February 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application and any material submitted in support of your
application.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that your assertion of being
referred to as a homosexual, even though not previously
considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the
existence of material error or injustice. The Board determined
that your allegations were not enough to outweigh the significant
misconduct you committed while serving on active duty. Further,
Board regulations state that personal appearances before the
Board are not granted as a right, but only when the Board
determines that such an appearance will serve some useful
purpose. in your case, the Board determined that a personal
appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on
the evidence of record. Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to.keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5321 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7527 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7492 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR671 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct marks assigned on a periodic basis.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5501 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service, the reason for your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6139 14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice, Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAO, SUITE tool ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4153 13
In essence, the Board felt you received payments for an obligation you did not fulfill and the Navy's action to make you repay the payments did not equate to material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8659 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 8112/0065 dated 12 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR8659-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8771 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0054 dated 11 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR8771-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8231 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.